This post is an expanded version of my previous post dated April 24th, 2014, where I explain how the nature of God as Love necessitates the entrance of sin in the world. This post repeats much of what was stated before, and discusses God’s nature of wrath. Here, we see that both God’s nature of love and wrath necessitates the entrance of sin in the world.
Question: The Bible tells us that God knows everything. So God would have known that when faced with the temptation of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, Adam would have fallen into sin. God could have made the world such that Adam would not have chosen to sin, or perhaps God could have given Adam another temptation which he knows Adam have obeyed God. Since God would have known which temptation would succeed in causing the fall of Adam and which would not have succeeded, why then did God choose to make a world where sin would enter the world? Is the entrance of sin into the world really necessary to bring about a greater good? How do you know this? Is there any biblical passage that teaches this?
Reply:
Dear (undisclosed name),
Your question is in many ways similar to what Gordon Clark wrote about why free will does not solve the problem of evil. Please refer to my post on Clark’s lifeguard analogy. It is insufficient to say that God merely allowed the fall to happen. If God knows how everything would turn out, and yet chose to make the world the way it is, then God did not just permit the creation of the world and its fall into sin. The entrance of Sin is his will. But why? Because the entrance of sin in the world allows for a greater glorification of God through the display of his attributes.
The Latin phrase, Felix Culpa, meaning, the “Fortunate fall”, is often used to describe Augustine’s understanding of why Adam chose to sin. In his book, Enchiridon: On Faith, Hope and Love, Augustine wrote that all things happen only because God wills it to happen. Augustine taught that God is not evil for willing the existence of evil because “God judged it better to bring good out of evil than not to permit any evil to exist.”[1]
Thus, by appealing to a greater good as the ultimate purpose for the existence of sin, Augustine seek to acquit God from the charge of evil. Augustine explained that Adam’s fall into sin was indeed God’s will, but God purposed that the fall would bring about greater glory for God than if Adam had not sin. During the reformation period, almost all of the reformers adopted Augustine’s view of Felix Culpa, in some form or another. It was always an appeal to a greater good in the purposes of God, for allowing sin in the world. Unfortunately, Augustine was not very effective in solving the problem of evil, nor did he develop this concept of Felix Culpa in much depth. Nevertheless, the understanding that the fall would bring about the greater glorification of God is indeed biblical. Here, I will develop Augustine’s theme further to show that the display of both God’s nature of love and wrath requires the initial entrance of sin in the world.
Psalm 135:6: “Whatever the LORD pleases, he does, in heaven and on earth, in the seas and all deeps.” (ESV).
As you have correctly pointed out, if God is all powerful, and all knowing, then the only way Adam could have fallen into sin is if God had knowingly willed for Adam to fall into sin. Mere permission doesn’t make sense in light of divine omniscience. Augustine’s Felix Culpa is a concept rooted in the understanding that God in his sovereignty, always does all that he desires. The fall of Adam happens not just because God gave permission for it to happen. It happened because God willed it. The fall of Adam is not a problem since it was purposed by God to bring about an even greater good, than if Adam had not fallen.
Let us consider the nature of God. The bible presents God as love (1 John 4:8)—the standard or epitome of love. But if God is the ultimate being of love, then consistent with this nature, it would be consistent for God to demonstrate the greatest act of love before his creation. What is the greatest act of love? John 15:13 tells us that the greatest act of love is for someone to lay down his life for his friends. So if God is the very epitome of love, it makes sense to say that God would display this attribute of love by laying down his life for a friend in redemption. Yet for someone to be in need of redemption, someone has to first fall into sin before he can be redeemed. In other words, in the grand scheme of things, for God to express His nature of love and redemption, there must first be the entrance of sin in the world. It thus follows that Adam (or at least someone), has to first fall into sin if God is to be glorified through the acts of redemption—remember: redemption is defined in the Bible as the greatest act of love. Thus, consistent with Felix Culpa, God in his eternal omniscience and love, purposed that through the fall of Adam, God would bring about a greater good through the act of redemption. Because God is love, sin exists.
The fall of Adam would not have taken an omniscient God by surprise. God in his omniscience would have known the ends from the beginning, and all of history would pan out as God has purposed. In fact, in Revelation 17:8, we are told that the names of those who would be saved were already written in the book of life before the foundation of the world was laid. But just because God has predestined and willed all of history, does not mean that Adam’s actions were not evil. God gave a strict commandment to Adam, and Adam deliberately chose to sin; and thus, Adam was guilty. Just because God in his omniscience purposed to bring about an even greater good through the means of the fall, does not in any way absolve Adam from the culpability of sin.
Also consider Romans 9:22-23, “What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory…”
Here, we are told why God endures vessels of wrath who are prepared for destruction. These vessels of wrath prepared for destruction allow God to display certain attributes of His glory—that is, the display of His attributes towards vessels of mercy is understood in the context of Romans 9:22-23 as a greater good.
Just as God displayed his attributes of love through redemption (which would first require the entrance of sin in the world), here in the context of Romans 9:22-23, we have the display of God’s attribute of wrath before vessels of mercy. Apart from vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, God’s attributes of wrath can never be displayed to vessels of mercy—an attribute which in Romans 9:22-23, fall under the category of “the riches of his glory”. But this display of God’s wrath also first requires the entrance of sin in the world, or there would have not been anything to be wrathful about.
Thus, in this way, we see that a display of both God’s attributes of love and wrath, require the entrance of sin in the world. While Sin is contrary to the nature of God, God in his omniscience willed Adam’s fall into sin because it would eventually bring about a greater good.
Summary: Both the attributes of Love and Wrath of God require the entrance of sin in the world.
I hope that helps,
David Tay
[1]Augustine, “Enchiridion: On Faith, Hope, and Love (English Translation),” Perkins School of Theology, http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/augustine_enchiridion_02_trans.htm.